| Referências: |
1. ALVESSON, Mats; SANDBERG, Jörgen. Generating Research Questions Trough Problematization. Academy of Managament Review, v. 36, n. 2, p. 247-271. 2011. 2. BERGER, P.; LUCKMANN, T. A Construção Social da Realidade. Petrópolis: Vozes. 1973. 3. BOXENBAUM, Eva; ROULEAU, Linda. New knowledge products as bricolage: metaphors and scripts in organizational theory. Academy of Managament Review, v. 36, n. 2, p. 272-296. 2011. 4. BURREL, G.; MORGAN, G. Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. Aldershot, UK., Ashgate Publishing Co. 2001. 5. CALDAS, M. P.; BERTERO, C. O. (coord.) Teoria das organizações. S. Paulo. Atlas. 2007. 6. CARVALHO, Cristina A.; VIEIRA, Marcelo M.F.; GOULART, Sueli A. Trajetória Conservadora da Teoria Institucional. Revista de Administração Pública, v. 39, n. 4, p. 849-874. 2005. 7. CLEGG, S. R.; HARDY, C.; NORD, W. R. (ed.) Handbook of Organization Studies. London. Sage Publications. 1997. 8. CORLEY, Kevin G.; GIOIA, Dennis A. Building Theory About Theory Building: what Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution? Academy of Management Review, v. 36, n. 1, p. 12-32. 2011. 9. DESSEN, Marina C.: PAZ, M. G. T. Bem-estar pessoal nas organizações: o impacto de configurações de poder e características de personalidade. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, v. 26, n. 3, p. 549-556, 2010. 10. DIMAGGIO, P. J., & POWELL, W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, v. 48, p. 147–160, 1983. 11. EISENHARDT, K.M. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review 14: 57-74. 1989. 12. GUARIDO FILHO, E. R.; MACHADO-DA-SILVA, C. L.; ROSSONI, L. The Social and Intellectual Dimensions in the Construction of Scientific Knowledge: The Institutional Theory in Organization Studies in Brazil. Brazilian Administration Review, v. 7, n. 2, p. 136-154, 2010. 13. GUERREIRO RAMOS, Alberto. A Nova Ciência das Organizações: uma Reconceituação da Riqueza das Nações. Rio de Janeiro. FGV. 1981. 14. HALL, P.A.; TAYLOR, R.C.R. As três versões do neo-institucionalismo. Lua Nova, São Paulo, n. 58, p. 193-223. 2003. 15. HERACLEOUS, Loizos; LAN, L. L. Agency theory, institutional sensitivity, and inductive reasoning: towards a legal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, v. 49, n. 1, p. 223-239, 2012. 16. JENSEN, Michael C.; MECKLING, W. H. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, v. 3, p. 305-360, 1976. 17. KILDUFF, Martin; MEHRA, Ajay; DUNN, Mary B. From Blue Sky Research to Problem Solving: A Philosophy of Science Theory of new Knowledge Production. Academy of Managament Review, v. 36, n. 2, p. 297-317. 2011. 18. KUHN, T. S. A estrutura das Revoluções Científicas, 2ª edição. São Paulo, Perspectiva 1978. 19. LAN, Luh Luh; HERACLEOUS, Loizos. Rethinking Agency Theory: The view from law. Academy of Management Review, v. 36, n. 2, p. 294-314. 2011. 20. MACHADO-DA-SILVA, C.L.; FONSECA, V.S.; CRUBELATE, J.M. Estrutura, Agência e Interpretação: Elementos para uma Abordagem Recursiva do Processo de Institucionalização. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, Ed. Especial, p. 77-107, 2010. 21. MEHROTRA, V. Angel agents: what we can (and cannot) learn from Pierre Lefaucheux’s stewardship of Régie Renault. Academy of Management Perspectives, May 2011, p. 14- 20. 22. MEYER, J. W.; ROWAN, B. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, v. 83, p. 340–363, 1977. 23. MILLER, D.; SARDAIS, C. Angel agents. Agency theory reconsidered. Academy of Management Perspectives, p. 6-13, 2011. 24. NORTH, Douglas. Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 5, p. 97-112. 1991. 25. OSWICK, Cliff; FLEMING, Peter; HANLON, Gerard. From Borrowing to Blending: rethinking the Process of Organizational Theory Building. Academy of Management Review, v. 36, n. 2, p. 318-337. 2011. 26. PAGÈS, M.; BONETTI, M.; GAULEJAC, V.; DESCENDRE, D. O Poder das Organizações. São Paulo. Atlas. 1993. 27. TSOUKAS, H.; KNUDSEN, C. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. 28. PFEFFER, J.; SALANCIK, G.R. The External Control of Organizations. Stanford, California. Stanford University Press. 2003. 29. RODRIGUES, S. B.; DUARTE, R. G.; CARRIERI, A. P. Indigenous or imported knowledge in Brazilian Management Studies: a quest for legitimacy? Management and Organization Studies. 2011. DOI 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00276.x 30. SANDBERG, Jörgen; TSOUKAS, Haridimos. Grasping the Logic of Practice: theorizing Through Practical Rationality. Academy of Management Review, v. 36, n. 2, p. 338-360. 2011. 31. SARAIVA, Luis A. S.; SANTOS, A. V. Estratégias de poder de trabalhadores industriais. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, v. 12, n. 4, p. 15-43, 2011. 32. SCOTT, W. R. The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 32, p. 493–511, 1987. 33. SCOTT, Richard W. Institutional Environments and Organizations: structural, Complexity and Individualism. Sage Publications. 1994. 34. _________. The Institutional Construction of Organizations: international and Longitudinal Studies. Sage Publications. 1995. 35. _________. Organizations: rational, Natural and Open Systems. 5th ed. Prentice Hall. 2003. 36. SCOTT, W. R.; MEYER, J. W. The organization of societal sectors. In: J. W. Meyer; W. R. Scott (Eds.). Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1983, p. 129-153. 37. SHEPHERD, Dean A.; SUTCLIFE, Kathleen M. Inductive Top-down Theorizing: A Source of New Theories of Organization. Academy of Management Review, v. 36, n. 2, p. 361-380. 2011. 38. SMITH, Wendy K.; LEWIS, Marianne W. Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Organizing. Academy of Management Review, v. 36, n. 2, p. 381- 403. 2011. 39. SUDDABY, Roy; HARDY, Cynthia; HUY, Nguyen. Where are the new Theories of Organization? Academy of Management Review, v. 36, n. 2, p. 236-246. 2011. 40. TOLBERT, P. S.; ZUCKER, L. G. Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 28, p. 22–39, 1983. 41. TRAGTEMBERG, M. Burocracia e Ideologia. São Paulo. Ática. 1974. 42. WEBER, Max. Economia e Sociedade. Brasília: Editora UnB. V. 1. 2004. 43. WISEMAN, Robert M.; CUEVAS-RODRIGUES, G.; GOMEZ-MEJIA, L. R. Towards a social theory of agency. Journal of Management Studies, v. 49, n. 1, p. 202-222, 2012. 44. WITTELOOSTUIJN, A. V.; BOONE, C. A resource-based theory of market structure and organizational form. Academy of Management Review, v. 31, n. 2, p. 409-426. 2006. 45. WILLIAMSON, O. E. Transaction Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations. The Journal of Law and Economics, v. 22, p. 233-261. 1979. 46. BARNEY, J. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, v. 17, n. 1. 1991. 47. PRIEM, R. L.; BUTLER, J. Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Academy of Management Review, v. 26, n. 1. p. 22-40. 2001. 48. BARNEY, J. Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, v. 26, n. 1. p. 41-56. 2001. 49. PRZYCZYNSKI, R.; VANTI, A. Recursos de tecnologia da informação sustentadores de vantagem competitiva: um estudo no setor metal-mecânico agroindustrial. RAM, Rev. Adm. Mackenzie, São Paulo, v. 13, n. 4, ago. 2012. 50. ASTLEY, W. G. Administrative Science as Socially Constructed Truth. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 30, n. 4, pp. 497-513. 1985. 51. DAVIS, G. F. Do Theories of Organizations Progress? Organizational Research Methods, v. 13, n. 4, pp. 690-709. 2010. 52. WALSH, J. P.; MEYER, A. D.; SCHOONHOVEN, C. B. A Future for Organization Theory: Living in and living with changing organizations. Organization Science v. 17, n. 5, pp. 657-671. 2006. 53. LUBATKIN, M.; LANE, P. J.; COLLIN, S.; VERY, P. An embeddedness framing of governance and opportunism: towards a cross nationally accommodating theory of agency. Journal of Organizational Behavior, v. 28, pp. 43–58. 2007. 54. MEYER, A. D.; GABA, V.; COLWELL, K. A. Organizing Far from Equilibrium: Nonlinear Change in Organizational Fields. Organization Science, v. 16, n. 5, pp. 456-473. 2005. 55. PERROW, C. An Organizational Analysis of Organizational Theory. Contemporary Sociology, v. 29, n. 3, pp. 469-476. 2000. 56. BORGES-ANDRADE, J.E.; PILATI, R. Validação de uma Medida de Percepção de Imagens Organizacionais. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, v. 4 n. 1, pp. 113- 134. 2000. 57. GREY, C. O Fetiche da Mudança. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 44, n. 1, pp. 10-25. 2004. 58. ROSSONI, L.; MACHADO-DA-SILVA, C. L. Legitimidade, Governança Corporativa e Desempenho. Análise das Empresas da BM&F Bovespa. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 53, n. 3, pp. 272-289. 2013. 59. CLEGG, S. R. Why is Organization Theory so Ignorant? The Neglect of Total Institutions. Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 15 n. 4, pp. 426-430. 2006. 60. CLEGG, S.; HARDY, C.; NORD, W. (Org.). Handbook de Estudos Organizacionais, vol. 1. São Paulo: Atlas, 2006. 61. DONALDSON, L. The contingency theory of organizations. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 2001. 62. LEIBLEIN, M. J. What do resource-and capability-based theories propose? Journal of Management, v. 37, n. 4, p. 909-932, 2011. 63. HILLMAN, A. J.; WITHERS, M. C.; COLLINS, B. J. Resource Dependence Theory: A Review. Journal of Management, v. 35, n. 6, p. 1404-1427, 2009. 64. POWELL, W. W.; DIMAGGIO, P. J. (Ed.) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1991. 65. CAMPBELL, J. L. Institutional change and globalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004. 66. GREENWOOD, R.; OLIVER, C; SAHLIN, K. SUDDABY, R. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2008. 67. CLEGG, S. (eds.). Sage Directions on Organization Studies, vol. 4. London: Sage, 2010. 68. SHAPIRO, S. P. Agency theory. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2005. 31:263–84 doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122159 |
