Banca de QUALIFICAÇÃO: IVAN GOMES BONIFACIO

Uma banca de QUALIFICAÇÃO de MESTRADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
STUDENT : IVAN GOMES BONIFACIO
DATE: 17/04/2024
TIME: 09:30
LOCAL: Video Conferência
TITLE:

Innovation Laboratories in the Judiciary: Results and Perspectives.

KEY WORDS:

Public Innovation; Innovation Laboratory; Judiciary; Results.

PAGES: 25
BIG AREA: Outra
AREA: Multidisciplinar
SUMMARY:

According to the 2023 Justice in Numbers report, produced by the National Council of Justice - CNJ, the Judiciary ended 2022 "with 81.4 million cases in progress. Of these, 17.7 million, or 21.7%, were suspended, stayed or in provisional archives, awaiting some future legal situation". (CNJ, 2023, p. 8). This report also shows that a court case can take, on average, between 4 and 9 years to be resolved, if it goes through all the instances and procedural stages. From this picture, what we see is a strong tendency for judicial congestion to continue and its deleterious effects on the economy, society and public policies, if other measures, in addition to the ordinary handling of judicial demands, are not undertaken. To be effective in this labor transformation, in order to meet the expectations of the users of judicial services, it is necessary to consider the characteristics of the contemporary world of accelerated transformations and to know how to deal with them. It is therefore necessary to prepare public managers, including judges, for a new paradigm, that of the "innovative leader", who encourages creativity, who is not prejudiced against "mistakes", who facilitates the transformation of good ideas into reality through collaborative and inclusive work and who gives autonomy to achieve results that can surpass routine performance. It is in this context that the Public Administration, in Brazil and around the world, has acted, housing professionals in spaces of shared creation, which allow creative capacity to be stimulated and applied in the production of prototypes or definitive solutions, aimed at improving public services, the so-called Innovation Labs. This is what Ferrarezi (2018) points out. In the Judiciary, this issue has taken on the air of public policy with the issuance of CNJ Resolution 395, of June 7, 2021, which established its Innovation Management Policy and determined the creation of the Judiciary's network of innovation laboratories, the so-called RenovaJud.  owever, because it is so recent, there is still no real insight into the characteristics of the Brazilian Judiciary's innovation laboratories, how they work, what their organizational structure is, how much resources they have, what methods they apply and the results they obtain. With the premise that the justice system remains congested and slow, and that innovation techniques and methods are valid alternatives for dealing with systemic problems in the public service, it is urgent to know whether the very recent practice of setting up innovation laboratories in the Judiciary has led to an improvement in judicial services and greater administrative efficiency. With this research, therefore, we hope to learn about the real application of the Judiciary's Innovation Policy, especially in relation to the results produced by the innovation labs and whether there have been any positive repercussions for the citizens who use these services.

COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Presidente - 2377637 - CHRISTIANA SOARES DE FREITAS
Interno - 2446851 - FRANCO DE MATOS
Interno - 2221664 - JOSE ANTONIO DE FRANCA
Externo à Instituição - Leonardo Ferreira de Oliveira
Interna - 1100988 - SHEILA CRISTINA TOLENTINO BARBOSA